0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
this might be a good idea but they are failing to take into account the health hazards of having high energy signals wirelessly transmitted.. i.e. the long term effects of having electrical signals messing with people's brains.. specifically the neuron firings and the synapse signals.. also the long term effects of the heart being exposed to high energy signals...also.. not to mention that wireless electricity is ridiculously inefficient... unless the technology is perfected and there are some long term health impact studies done on the matter.. personally, i will stay faaaaarr away from this no matter how cool the idea..
also.. not to mention that wireless electricity is ridiculously inefficient... unless the technology is perfected and there are some long term health impact studies done on the matter.. personally, i will stay faaaaarr away from this no matter how cool the idea..
OK Dr Oz.....what is your empirical evidence?
thats what i am saying.. there isnt enough empirical evidence to suggest either ways! i mean.. i have a philips shaving machine that charges wirelessly (induction charging).. basically if u keep the hand unit anywhere about 1 foot from the base stand, it charges..also there is a huge difference between the type of signals cell phones use as compared to the signal strength required to transmit electricity..there is empirical evidence about the increased rates of tumors and cancers to people who live near electrical wire towers and power substations.. thats why i was wondering what large scale wireless electricity would do...just wondering cuz we dont have evidence either way..