KEAGaming

KEA Servers => Day of Defeat Source => Topic started by: UKM on September 11, 2009, 12:27:36 PM

Title: FPS
Post by: UKM on September 11, 2009, 12:27:36 PM
Hey all,
If you go into console and type "net_graph 1" without thw quotations, it will show you your fps, in and out, and all that good stuff.

So, my reason for creating this thread is to find out what everyone gets for their FPS.

I get around 200FPS (Frames per second) on DODs. It's amazing.
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: MIFIVE on September 11, 2009, 12:38:54 PM
FPS stands for frames per second? I'm not sure who you are, but god bless you sir. God bless you and all your knowledge that you bring to this community. You are a humanitarian, a philanthropist, and an altruist benefactor!
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: fury on September 11, 2009, 01:23:56 PM
6..is that a bad thing?
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: DC on September 11, 2009, 01:40:54 PM
If I stare at a wall maybe 65.  Out in the middle between 30-45 depending which side of the map I trying to snipe down. 
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: UKM on September 11, 2009, 02:37:34 PM
Well, with lower FPS (Frames per second), it really effects your overall gameplay. I really notice the difference with my new computer than my old one. I'm averaging around 250-280 FPS right now. Which is very good.
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: trooper is j on September 11, 2009, 03:29:02 PM
I average 90 fps,  And I run 1920x1080 resolution in game, with settings maxed out.
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: UKM on September 11, 2009, 03:50:47 PM
That's pretty good Trooper.
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: Ban Em All on September 11, 2009, 05:41:02 PM
I average 110-230. 1680x1050 with custom video settings, I think I have my AA more than what it should be. A few graphics settings not listen in the options gui.
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: D-MAN on September 11, 2009, 06:20:25 PM
Quote from: Ban Em All on September 11, 2009, 05:41:02 PM
I have my AA more than what it should be.
Whats "AA" ? And RAMBO made a config for me so that I max out at 29/30 Works WAY better than it did when I was pushing 40-50. Very happy. Thanks pumpkin!
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: BMFPoochie on September 11, 2009, 06:28:34 PM
Anti Aliasing... it's what smooths out square edges on textures. More important for lower resolutions, when less dots are being drawn. Then again I run 1920x1200 and still have it at 8x.
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: D-MAN on September 11, 2009, 06:31:50 PM
Quote from: BMFPoochie on September 11, 2009, 06:28:34 PM
Anti Aliasing....
Is that some config shit or can it be enabled? I need that, would help me lots....
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: Ban Em All on September 11, 2009, 06:57:56 PM
Quote from: D-MAN on September 11, 2009, 06:31:50 PM
Is that some config shit or can it be enabled? I need that, would help me lots....
You might get a lot of choppy game play because it can be really hard on the graphics card. just go to options>video>advance. the higher the number, the better the quality, but the lower the fps.
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: RAMBO on September 12, 2009, 03:31:21 PM
On my bad PC i stop it at 30. On my good PC, i get around 200.
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: D-MAN on September 12, 2009, 04:05:35 PM
Quote from: Ban Em All on September 11, 2009, 06:57:56 PM
You might get a lot of choppy game play because it can be really hard on the graphics card. just go to options>video>advance. the higher the number, the better the quality, but the lower the fps.
OK, Ty.
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: Rev. Jim Jones on September 12, 2009, 04:33:41 PM
I get -4 to -30 with my SLI gtx monster 3d 2000. Is that good?

About 50-60 with a gts 8800 320 :p
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: [OnA]Sloppy on September 16, 2009, 10:25:33 AM
so you guys know if your fps go's from 60 to 30 that is not a good thing, before you join the server you should put in fps_max(or max_fps) and set it to a number where your fps will stay constant, that is the most important thing.
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: Eureka! on December 22, 2009, 08:40:26 PM
I normally have v-sync on but a quick run gave me 100-300fps ingame... 1680x1050 with 8xAA.

I built this rig to max out crysis... 4890 OC'd :D.
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: klacko10 on December 23, 2009, 02:17:16 AM
i get betwen 9 and 27 (fcking laptop)
laging most off the time
 
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: pixiestyx on December 23, 2009, 07:58:08 AM
I get average of 50-60 top settings, minus anti aliasing, 1920x1200
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: Spartacus on July 19, 2010, 04:33:03 PM
I get 25-40 depending on the scenery exposed as my good computer blew-up.

Oldy enough, the resolution doesn't have a great affect on fps (high or low has little difference), the main problem I have is the poor performance of the AMD Sempron 2800+ :-/

The fps_max tip sounds good, I'll give it a try as the frame rate does vary on my slow computer.
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: Joeseph Geobbels on July 27, 2010, 12:58:53 AM
i know yall bitches gon be mad and all, but i get 40-50 FPS (1024x768)with a radeon x550/x600, a video card made in 2004 made by microsoft, for sony vaio computers. i dare to see if anyone has a worse GPU than me.
also something to really boil your skin. im also running a P4 550(3.40) in a LGA 775 socket. i think im in love with it too much to get rid of it or upgrade.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: fury on July 27, 2010, 08:59:26 AM
lol nice specs

smurray has a shittier set up, if i remember correctly..
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: pixiestyx on July 27, 2010, 09:08:10 AM
Quote from: fury on July 27, 2010, 08:59:26 AM
lol nice specs

smurray has a shittier set up, if i remember correctly..


No, he broke his comp with a splash of vodka ( no SRSLY), so he now has a newer laptop with an amd Dual core.
Title: Re: FPS
Post by: Shadow of Enigma on July 27, 2010, 04:35:19 PM
Quote from: Eureka! on December 22, 2009, 08:40:26 PM
I normally have v-sync on but a quick run gave me 100-300fps ingame... 1680x1050 with 8xAA.

I built this rig to max out crysis... 4890 OC'd :D.

hey which 4890 do you have? I've got an Asus standard clock'd one.

On DoD with max settings i get about 100-250, but sometimes it stutters down to 25-35, which is rather odd.